Your cart is empty.
Your cart is empty.Product Description
Federico
August 19, 2025
Love this magic rack!
Marvin S.
August 12, 2025
I wasn’t sure if I could leave zero stars.This was the worst item I have ever bought, sending it back as soon as I have a second to do so. It’s a piece of plastic that they failed to copy properly, just sad.
Rick&Les
June 12, 2025
I had seen these used for professional tournaments and it looked like a really easy way to rack. And indeed the product lives up to its name. Package contained 6 templates, each easily racks 8 9 or 10 balls.Material is very thin so as not to disturb the ball path after breaking. But the film feels pretty durable so I expect them to hold up for quite a while unless they are accidentally folded.The only downside, and this is not in any way the products fault, but these are too big to fit in most pool cue cases. And the folder they come in is just cardboard, which could be easily bent ruining all them. I think I'll find a thin three ring binder with page protectors to keep them in for transport.
steve
March 20, 2025
these come in many iterations. the fiber ones are currently more popular but i prefer these thin plastic ones. they're less likely to affect the ball rotation and i think they wear better.
Kevlar
March 15, 2025
These are a complete fail. The whole point of the film style racks is they give a more or less perfect rack with very little effort every time. Not these ones. No matter how I tried to coax the balls into a tight rack it just wouldn't happen. The cutouts in the plastic aren't very precise, and the plastic is remarkably thick.The first photo is self explanatory, it LOOKS like a good rack.Edit. The pictures aren't displayed in the order they were uploaded. The photo with the 5 & 15 ball, and with the 14 & 15, show the gaps with these racks. The 2 and 8 ball photo shows the proper tight rack with a different brand.Second photo (15 & 5) shows the gap between the balls.Third photo (14 & 15) shows a gap again, using a different rack rom the same pack.Fourth (2 & 8) shows a proper tight rack, using an existing film rack I have.Fifth shows the difference between these and my existing film rack. The Scott Edward one is on the bottom. You can see that the cut out is slightly larger and a little uneven compared to the good one on top.The last two photos show the difference in thickness between the S.E. one and my existing film rack. The S.E. is over twice as thick at .15mm.These are a hard pass.
Federico
March 15, 2025
Love this magic rack!
Marvin S.
March 3, 2025
I wasn’t sure if I could leave zero stars.This was the worst item I have ever bought, sending it back as soon as I have a second to do so. It’s a piece of plastic that they failed to copy properly, just sad.
Rick&Les
March 1, 2025
I had seen these used for professional tournaments and it looked like a really easy way to rack. And indeed the product lives up to its name. Package contained 6 templates, each easily racks 8 9 or 10 balls.Material is very thin so as not to disturb the ball path after breaking. But the film feels pretty durable so I expect them to hold up for quite a while unless they are accidentally folded.The only downside, and this is not in any way the products fault, but these are too big to fit in most pool cue cases. And the folder they come in is just cardboard, which could be easily bent ruining all them. I think I'll find a thin three ring binder with page protectors to keep them in for transport.
steve
February 28, 2025
these come in many iterations. the fiber ones are currently more popular but i prefer these thin plastic ones. they're less likely to affect the ball rotation and i think they wear better.
Kevlar
February 19, 2025
These are a complete fail. The whole point of the film style racks is they give a more or less perfect rack with very little effort every time. Not these ones. No matter how I tried to coax the balls into a tight rack it just wouldn't happen. The cutouts in the plastic aren't very precise, and the plastic is remarkably thick.The first photo is self explanatory, it LOOKS like a good rack.Edit. The pictures aren't displayed in the order they were uploaded. The photo with the 5 & 15 ball, and with the 14 & 15, show the gaps with these racks. The 2 and 8 ball photo shows the proper tight rack with a different brand.Second photo (15 & 5) shows the gap between the balls.Third photo (14 & 15) shows a gap again, using a different rack rom the same pack.Fourth (2 & 8) shows a proper tight rack, using an existing film rack I have.Fifth shows the difference between these and my existing film rack. The Scott Edward one is on the bottom. You can see that the cut out is slightly larger and a little uneven compared to the good one on top.The last two photos show the difference in thickness between the S.E. one and my existing film rack. The S.E. is over twice as thick at .15mm.These are a hard pass.
Recommended Products
$24.95
$ 10 .99 $10.99